• -1 Players on Java
  • us.mineplex.com
  • -2 Players Online
  • -1 Players on Bedrock
  • pe.mineplex.com
!
Attention Internet Explorer Users
To have the best user experience on our site please consider upgrading to Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox

MathFox
760
Posts
629
Likes
Profile Options
MathFox
Active Forum User
    1. Krystal The Fox
      Post Options
      Whats 0 divided by 0?
      1. MathFox
        MathFox
        Oct 16, 2020
        Comment Options
        Undefined, but when the limit of a function is 0/0 l'hopital's rule can be applied to find a solution.
    2. Orangey✌
      Post Options
      Can u do my math homework plz
      1. MathFox
        MathFox
        Sep 11, 2020
        Comment Options
        Give me a question.
      2. Orangey✌
        Orangey✌
        Sep 11, 2020
        Comment Options
        ok i lied i dont have my homework yet i give u on later xD
    3. scarlet
      Post Options
      is this the teeth person?? they seem awfully interested in eula stuff
      1. MathFox
        MathFox
        Sep 11, 2020
        Comment Options
        Seems I'm well known.
    4. zoomfay
      Post Options
      Hey! I've come to realize your claims have a point, though i've reviewed certain documents and don't think the EULA was violated, but more than likely the Commercial Usage Guideline, although I don't have significant evidence to back up proof of this, the commercial usage guideline seems to be very lenient. Take a look here -> https://account.mojang.com/documents/commercial_guidelines
      1. MathFox
        MathFox
        Sep 10, 2020
        Comment Options
        Look mate, I don't want to get into this fully tonight (I may later) but to put it simply Mineplex is violating everything. That one right there, I'm quite sure the Immortal Gem/xp boost violates that technically (in the sense that a very basic understanding of it shows that Immortal is in violation). To add on to that, the EULA Q&A clearly outlaws personal Gem/xp boosters. To even further compound on to that, official Mojang employees I asked said that a system like Gem/xp boosters on Mineplex is in clear violation of the EULA (which they also said was still in effect). An even stronger source of evidence I think is that one of the template things you can report a server for is a personal xp/soft currency (gems) booster. While Minecraft may be lenient with the EULA, Mineplex claims to follow it. Shouldn't they put their money where their mouth is?
    5. MathFox
      Post Options
      Not my usual sort of reason for disliking new features, (EULA) but almost all of the recent Immortal perks were cool ideas suggested for all people. Sure, Mineplex needs to make money. But almost all of the cool new non-gamemode ideas are denied, then implemented for people who pay. I get that Immortal needs cool perks, but the community had been asking for Bulk chest openings as a QOL thing for a while now. My least favorite Immortal only feature is the spectator thingy, as I remember being able to do that as a non ranked player back in the days. I hope some new features are given to players who don't want to shell out 7 bucks a month.
    6. zlxr (Suspici0us)
      Post Options
      Check my wall post I think you will find it amusing
    7. Starx280
      Post Options
      What type of tooth r u

      Cause that’s a pretty thicc tooth
      1. MathFox
        MathFox
        Jun 6, 2020
        Comment Options
        Molar.
    8. yulufi / Sean
      Post Options
      I love how you make a ton of threads on the EULA, still somehow managing to complain about the already 2-month ago release of immortal. No offense, but please stop. Your sarcasm in the thread you made about clans mount skins also doesn't help. "Mineplex adores mojang's EULA *cough**immortal rank* *cough*". Really? There have been around 13 threads based off the same issue / point, and you bringing it up again does not help in the slightest. So this profile post was to just make a request; please stop bringing up mineplex and its relationship with the EULA. Sorry if you found this offensive in anyway. On the contrary; I was just suggesting something that might help your reputation on the mineplex forums.

      Thanks!
      1. View previous comments...
      2. asfhjjsnx782$e
        asfhjjsnx782$e
        May 14, 2020
        Comment Options
        Mineplex fanboy moment
      3. zlxr (Suspici0us)
        zlxr (Suspici0us)
        Jul 12, 2020
        Comment Options
        Ironic
      4. MathFox
        MathFox
        Jul 12, 2020
        Comment Options
        I find it interesting that pretty much exactly what I said would happen did. The added a feature they said would never get added for EULA reasons. Sure this could have been a miscommunication, but I think they wanted to see how the community would react to adding a feature that everyone thought violated the EULA. Staff have also been acting weird lately, and I just got a forum post deleted for bringing these things to light.
    9. Korben
      Post Options
      Hi LordOfDentiests
    10. Ozammor / Yato
      Post Options
      [​IMG]
      an alligator tooth
    11. Ozammor / Yato
      1. MathFox
        MathFox
        Aug 10, 2019
        Comment Options
        heyo
  • User Minecraft Info
    About User
    Information
    Social
    LordOfTeeth#5086
  • Loading...
Image
Image URL: