In Discussion Team Switchers

Um, you only win if your original team hits 16 players and the original 4 of the team win. Plus, why would people give up? And what does exploiting mean?

 

This entire thread is obviously Cupi just trying to get more "posts" his other account was banned for spam and mingey content..

 

This would be obviously NOT true if you have known better.

I clearly saw there was a ticket for something else, I think it was something like security reasons. I can't remember exactly as the email had been deleted after I saw it. If you are trying to make people against me, go all for it! Keep in mind that this is a lie. Plus Admins/Mods don't ban people for bad ideas, and if that happened, I'd get forum banned (duhh). Also, I'd be warned for post boosting.

Oh, and I can't believe that @leo_thya believes what you said @Jaxxy

 

I like where you're going with this idea, although I think you need some more expansion. Right now, it's too similar to Micro Battles or Nano Battles in Nano, and I think that this would just become players sacrificing themselves because their team is looking good for the win. This game needs to be a bit different from Micro Battles to actually get its own playerbase, like stated above. Another thing, if this were to be its own separate game (not a Nano game) then I'd like to see what you have in mind for possible kits or maps. Right now I think that this game will benefit the most from being a Nano game.

 

There are different definitions of post boosting. For one, there is post-boosting according to the Mineplex rules. According to this post-boosting rule, you are not able to be punished for it. Post-boosting could also mean literally, "trying to boost one's post count", which you basically said yourself, openly, on your own wall. So don't think I believe him just because he said it, I have my own reasons and things I've observed myself.

Anyways, this is off-topic.

 

The map is like a small arena, and yes, I will add kits, but you can give kit ideas for this
--- Post updated ---

I think @Jaxxy might be actually trying to Slander me, or trying to turn people against me.

 

Nope, just pointing out the obvious, you make pointless forum threads, even stating on your profile that you are 1/18 away from your goal of beating the amount of posts you had on your previous account.
--- Post updated ---

https://imgur.com/ONmqlxk

 

Heyo!

I gave my opinion on the previous thread I believe addressing this idea, but I'll restate. This may get repetitive and boring, not including how people could indirectly team. Also, what would be the point when you're trying to die to get onto the winning team almost? Sorry, this is a -1 from me because I don't think it would be a good active game to play.

 

THREAD NOTICE

I don't really have an opinion on this, but from what I am seeing, this thread is clearly gearing off topic. Let's remember that this is 'New Game Discussion'. This means you should be discussing the idea at hand, not each other, their profiles, etc. This thread is going to become a flame war soon if you guys don't sort this out privately and appropriately. I'll be reviewing this thread to hopefully see an improvement in the context of some of the replies on this thread. I'd rather not have to lock this, so this notice is here to allow you guys to actively and constructively contribute to the thread.

 

Im confused because wdym players sacrificing themselves to team? Is it giving up on your team, you've gotta at least try. Also, how do you make this different from Micro Battles?

 

I would definitely echo this question. I feel like if I died and was placed on a team I didn’t like per se, I may not put any effort into helping my new team as my friend may be on a different team. This game idea (although extremely interesting) relies on the assumption that people will play regardless of their team affiliation. As we know, in party/friends situations the changing of teams can be adversarial to the overall gameplay of this game.

I like the idea and I think it would be a cool nano game to have, but I am unsure whether the constant changing of teams would have any adverse impacts on the overall gameplay experience.

 

I actually like the concept of this game and think it would be great fun! However this lacks quite a lot of detail and the answer to a lot of questions so perhaps if more details could be provided such as:

Are there any kits? If so what kits?
How long does the game last?
Ideas for any achievements?

I think this would really help people to get a better understanding of the game but I think something like this may be better suited perhaps as a Nano game instead of the minigame in Quick! where you have zombies chasing you and think that this would definitely be a better alternative to that game mode. Also as stated above there would probably need to be some time limit on the game or rounds as people could easily just keep this game going for a while and going back and forth which could perhaps make games a little irritating for the players.

 

1. I did add 1 kit (Will add more kits though you can suggest some).

2. The max time is 5 minutes. The game lasts till one team has 16 players. And the original 4 of that team actually win. If 5 minutes have passed but no winner, the team with the most players win instead!

3. I don't have any achievement ideas yet, but you can suggest some!

 

Updates: Turned the 4 teams of 4, to 2 teams of 8 (I hope this reduces sacrificing). Also, I added "assisted wins" as suggested by @GuitarHero_King!

 

Well I think this is a great idea